https.earth

Are you interested in joining us - to be invited to our fantastic places in Iceland or Switzerland? Please visit our volunteer page. We do not only invite volunteers but scientists, strategists, influencers, donors and other important people, who may be able to help us better this world.

Already in October 2020, The UN comprehensive response to Covid (see the quotes below) predicted 13 million additional child marriages as a consequence of the lockdowns.

"The human impacts of lockdowns and suspensions of social and economic activity are disproportionately felt by the most vulnerable countries and segments of the population. Poverty could rise by 420-580 million people – the first increase in three decades – with 70-100 million at risk of falling back into extreme poverty. "

When families have lost everything and may be on the brink of starvation, selling their children into marriage becomes an option (this year or in 10 years). What follows is what we in the West would call statutory rape, but not only that, for when the child objects, it is rape in every sense of the word and made even more horrible, for the child is raped again and again, can not escape from the rapist, can not get support from law enforcement nor does the child have access anymore to the comforting of parents that every child should be entitled to.

"Current estimates indicate that for every 3 months of lockdown, an additional 15 million women are expected to be subjected to violence. Seven million unintended pregnancies can be expected if the lockdown continues for at least 6 months and an additional 13 million child marriages may consequently take place between 2020 and 2030 that could otherwise have been averted. "

The UN institutes are well aware of the problem, but they are also responsible. For they were instrumental in creating this COVID-19 panic. Reports and vague policy directives do not make up for this manmade overreaction when countries fail to follow the new directives.

Since most people are actually not at risk at all from COVID-19 and most of the deaths are preventable and because the lockdowns will create more deaths and much more suffering, the lockdowns have to end now and especially the travel restrictions. We can still hold on to what may make sense such as using masks when visiting the vulnerable or in crowded public transport and keeping home office an optional choice for as many as possible.

The hormone that is vital for the immune system (Vitamin-D)

By and large COVID-19 kills only people with preexisting comorbidities. The most frequent exceptions concern overweight people and colored people who are living in temperate climates or who do not get enough exposure to the sun because of modern lifestyles (and actually now in some cases because the lockdowns themselves are preventing them from being outside, which is insane because it is counterproductive). There is a simple reason why these people are at a so much of a higher risk and that is because their immune response is not working properly because of vitamin D deficiency.

Millions can still be saved

The solution is to do what what Finland does and was doing before the pandemic (to add vitamin D to a common food item) and to recommend to people to take their own supplements (Helsinki region) based on their biological need.

Vitamin D and stopping lockdowns makes sense irrespective of whether you are pro COVID vaccination or not

It is clear that vaccination does not stop the spread of the SARS-2 virus. Like vitamin-D vaccination seems to reduce the severity of cases and slows down the spread since people who get less sick tend to spread it less. However the delta variant seems to be changing the nature of the virus. It seems to spread more easily among everybody, including those that are vaccinated and those that are not at risk, including those with enough vitamin-D. On the other hand this variant is not nearly as deadly. Seems to be on par with the normal flu and may therefore be regarded as a natural super vaccine.

Vitamin-D may actually help people cope with the vaccine.

A population where a part of the population is protected with both vaccination and vitamin-D and the other is protected by Vitamin-D alone will surely do better than a population that leaves out the vitamin-D for all.

We need your help

We can not emphasize enough that we need your help in spreading our message. It has taken Ireland a year to discover Finland's secret with a lot of lives lost in the meantime. We now have a real chance of getting some other countries to follow. Please share our message, e.g. by typing or pasting in this link https://https.https.earth into all your social media accounts and messaging apps. If you do it and your friends and acquaintances do it then eventually it will reach strong influencers and politicians and governments which will hopefully lead to a policy change for the benefit of us all.

To make this graph more readable on a mobile device turn the device sideways

To make this graph more readable on a mobile device turn the device sideways

The manslaughter continues (see the graph above) in countries like Germany that go out of their way to publicly deny the evidence for the effectiveness of Vitamin-D where as Ireland which recommended Vitamin-D for everyone and higher doses for risk groups has achieved as much success as the UK with much lower vaccination levels.

Against the truth

There are a lot of half truths, false information, and blatant lies spread on the Internet and by politicians, by some media and even by supposedly reputable institutions. It is understandable that many desperately want to believe that the authorities have been doing the right thing for it is a double shock to realize that so much of what we have been made to go through could have been avoided.

Plenty of evidence

Even though these tactics are well thought out and carefully planned, they can not hide the truth if and only if we are willing to make a little bit of an effort to use our common sense to observe:

• What is working and what is not working

• If we use our common sense to explain why on exception a few studies do not show a correlation between SARS-COV-2 / COVID-19 vitamin-D levels or treatments

  1. That the time between when a blood vitamin-D level was taken and the incidence of a SARS-COV-2 infection

     • The worst example of which is using data that is 10-14 year old

     • which probably did not take account of seasonal variability in peoples vitamin-D levels

     • Even short time lapse may make the measurements meaningless as many peoples vitamin-D levels are changing dramatically because of lockdowns, supplements or the weather

  2. If people get one shot of vitamin-D (which is known to be less effective) then vitamin-D administered over time

  3. When people who are known to have little or no deficiency are given just a little bit more

  4. If people are given vitamin-D too late, e.g. 10 days after the onset of infection

  5. If people are given vitamin-D at a late stage of infection where calcifediol (a vitamin-D derivate) would be more effective

  6. When the sample size is too small giving meaningful data when taken together with other studies but in itself not significant and not surprisingly so, for it is almost impossible to do a clinical study which eliminates all the comorbidity or significant factors. How do you do a clinical study of people in their prime age, where you want to adjust for race and vitamin-D where almost all the patience are colored?

  7. Studies that may have studied respiratory dieses but not COVID-19, especially with the above shortcomings

• The epidemiological evidence

• The unifying factor between the hardest hit groups (low levels of seasonal vitamin D)

  1. Somalian woman in Sweden (they are at double risk because not only are they dark but many cover their whole body preventing any synthesis of vitamin-D from the sun). Somalian woman were also reported to be worst affected in Norway and Denmark.

  2. Colored doctors in the UK (there is a trend to discount the colored because it is argued that the lower social economic status is the main factor. However obviously this does not apply to doctors. The overwhelming majority of doctors who where dying form COVID-19 in the first wave in the UK were colored)

  3. Colored people who are living in less sunny climates and/or who are more indoors

  4. Black people in Texas (again the economic status does not explain it, as the average black household income in Texas is higher than the average white household income in for example Germany) We call the inaction systemic racism that results from our prejudges (the wrong assumption that the colored do not have access to health care) that prevent us from seeing the real reason (vitamin-D deficiency) why the colored are suffering and the outcome of this inaction are preventable deaths: systemic genocide

We find the situation so absurd. It would be comparable to, if in the 1980s we would have ignored that gay and drug addicts were the hardest hit by HIV / AIDS and we would not have given out specific advice to those.

Under the current pandemic we just need to give the advice for everyone who has deficiency to take vitamin D, the colored and people in care to take a double dosage and the overweight to take a 5 fold dosage. Better still also to quickly act to supplement a common food item with vitamin D.

• 5. The black people in the US that are dying from COVID-19 on average at a 10 year younger age than white people

  6. The portion of the people who are classified as white in America who are the hardest hit in that group but which happen to be not really white but Arab

  7. The slightly darker skinned white people (on average) in countries like France, Italy and Spain versus for example Germany

  8. People who are living further away from the sea in hot regions e.g. Madrid (These people have less access to fresh fish and hence consume less fish than people near the costal areas)

  9. Colored people who are in sunny but extremely hot regions, covered from head to toe and living inside most of the time. Typically stepping directly between their air conditioned houses and cars

  10. The portion of the population that hardly goes out such as those addicted to work, video games or social media or because of the fear for the pandemic

  11. And last but not least people in modern care facilities (of course this applies to the elderly and even more to the very sick), where resources are not available for the people to be taken outdoors. (Conversely, in the old days people who could afford it with tuberculosis - a different type of lung disease - would be taken into the mountains to sunbath in the UVB rich mountain sun)

• The unifying factor between the regions that are doing better (high levels of vitamin D)

  1. Countries where people eat on average more than 1 kg of fish per week

  2. Communities where people eat more fish such as Asians. Even in the US their death rate is not higher than that of white people even though they are colored and hence much lower than for other colored people.

  3. Countries or regions where more people take fish liver oil

  4. Countries where people are naturally more outside and lightly dressed

  5. In the rare cases the countries that have higher average vitamin-D levels when they do have spikes they tend to be very short lived. A logical explanation for this is that as the even though the general population is protected there are some people that are not and constitute the spike cases

• The connection between the seasons both on the northern and southern hemisphere and the severity of COVID-19. (Peoples vitamin-D deficiencies are seasonal for obvious reason as explained previously)

• How the cases increase as the regions are further into the winter season or the rainy seasons. As peoples body stock of vitamin-D is lowered or depleted

• How the cases gradually decrease as the weather becomes more comfortable to be outside wearing less clothes

• The connection between heavy pollution and COVID-19 (the pollution both blocks out some of the sun and causes extra stress for the lungs)

• How Covid-19 affects women less when their estrogen (which is the woman's hormone and that works a bit like vitamin-D ) levels are high and how conversely the difference between men and women narrows after women hit menopause (in the cases where they do not replace this natural loss of estrogen with supplements)

• Mongolia appeared to be an anomality as this land locked land (and therefore presumably with lesser access to fish than other Asian countries) had one of the lowest incidents of SARS-CoV-2) and COVID-19 death rate in the world suggesting an immunity (perhaps from some previous local SARS outbreak). Unfortunately as of April 2021 this is no longer the case.

• The thousands of doctors, professors and other experts advocating vitamin D for COVID-19

• That aside from the fact that the lockdowns will cause much more lives to be indirectly lost, they do not seem to be as effective as expected in limiting peoples susceptibility to COVID-19. The lockdown situation prevents people either physically or through fear from going outside and/or taking sunny vacations and hence lowers their exposure to the sun and makes them more susceptible to COVID-19

• By reducing Vitamin-D deficiencies we could also be lowering the incidence of Osteoporosis, Multiple Sclerosis, severe flu, obesity, mental health problems, pregnancy complications, diabetes, depression and deaths by cancer.

• Together we created a global economy. It is not right to abandon and to ignore what is happening in the third world

• If it would be possible to do a simultaneous world wide lockdown for a maximum of two weeks then theoretically the virus could be stopped in its tracks. But to do uncoordinated lockdowns, repeated and extended lockdowns just does not make any sense

  1. To do so to flatten the curve does not make sense. It is far cheaper to create extra ICU units than to harm not only your own economy but the world economy. Pushing 500 million people into poverty. Not even counting the multi magnitude higher cost of dealing with the addictions, the psychological problems and deaths that will result from the lockdowns

  2. Many people will find ingenious ways of avoiding the lockdowns. Indeed hidden intimate social contact between a few people at a time is much more contagious than a public gathering with a few targeted precautions

• The UN best estimates of the impact of the lockdowns (see the quotes above)

• The CDC (The US Center for Disease Control) best estimates of how changes in situation between mid 2019 and mid 2020 has affected life expectancy in the USA. So far (based on mid 2020 data) showing an average loss of one year in life expectancy. Based on end of the year data. 1.5 years.*1

The lockdowns are the worst

It is hard to accept how countries are overreacting with so much lockdowns and spreading of fear as there are other demonstrable methods available (as discussed above) and enough evidence to suggest they would work (as with Finland) as well as information that they would do no harm. On the other hand, we have more and more evidence that the lockdowns are causing harm of catastrophic proportions. By extrapolating (because of the tripling of the length of the crisis) the numbers that are based on the already available public data and forecasts such as that of the CDC, the UN and other sources and common sense we see the impact of the lockdowns and the unnecessary fear induced in people as follows. We think that most individual points are enough reason not to go for these lockdowns, let alone when all are taken together:

• A lot more life years lost thru the Lockdowns and campaigns of fear than thru COVID-19 itself *1

• Additional 20 million plus child marriages resulting from poverty in the years ahead

• Additional 50 million women subject to violence

• Additional 500 million plus people being pushed into poverty (the progress of the last 30 years wiped out)

• Additional 100s of millions people being pushed into extreme poverty

• Millions of businesses going out of business

• Millions of businesses not going out of business but where the net worth build over a lifetime has been wiped out

• Millions of businesses kept alive often by public credit for which they have to slave to repay for years to come

• 10s of millions of people loosing out on friendship and love

• 100s of millions of people loosing their jobs

• 100s of millions of people being out of job long term

• 10s of millions of people being permanently out of work

• Millions of people being affected by increased racism

• Additional 10s of millions of child abuse cases

• Additional 10s of millions of couple breakups

• Additional 100s of millions of people going into depression

• Additional 10s of millions of people becoming addicted to opiates and doctor subscribed medications

• Additional 10s of millions of people becoming addicted to other drugs

• Additional 10s of millions of people becoming addicted to alcohol

• Additional 10s of millions of people who will die at an early age because of the above mentioned addictions

• Additional 100s of millions of people being affected by the addictions of others

• Additional 100s of millions of people who will develop psychological disorders

• The rich getting much richer and the middle class and the poor poorer

• Additional trillions upon trillions of dollars worth of public debt that normal people will have to pay for in the future through taxes, through inflation, through less consumer choice, through public expenditure savings in the future and hence less public services in the future and probably decreased pensions

• More money being spent by the authorities and less by the people themselves. Consolidation of power

• Reduction in multi cultural offerings such as by multi cultural restaurants

• The loss in peoples ability to make their own choices

• The increase in the power of money governed invested interest

• The increase in the polarization of extreme views

• The increase in hysteria, the worked up crowd phenomena

• The increase in prejudice. Either "you are with us or against us" line of thinking. Grouping everybody together towards two poles. Whereas a healthy society would benefit from critical and diverse thinking with a multitude of intrinsic variability.

• The increase in mass shootings

• The loss of freedom of expression

• The reduction in independent reporting

For very useful and extra information, appropriate application (how much vitamin D, how frequent and what else deficient people should take or how to administer for a community or country) as well as for some references please refer to our other website end-covid-19.org

Please also take a look at our 2nd page here - The good news, the information and the foreign language videos below

email endcovid19org@gmail.com

WhatsApp +41763560000

Here we used to have a recording of a legitimate TV program by investigative journalists on ARTE titled "Research, fake and dirty tricks". It seems to have been removed at the request of people who engage in suppressing critical news.

One example in the video showed how a pharma company used a resistant type of rat to show that a poisonous chemical was not so poisonous. It is analogues to the method of using one shot Vitamin-D treatments for a study when it is already known that daily dosages work much better.

Introduction to Harvard University "Vitamin D for COVID-19 (VIVID) trial"

"Laboratory studies demonstrate that vitamin D is active in pathways relevant to immune function, stimulating the expression of vitamin D receptors in both the innate and the adaptive immune systems. Vitamin D metabolites support innate immune responses to several viruses in cultured human respiratory epithelial cells [^{[3], [4], [5], [6], [7]}], including rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Vitamin D may reduce the burden of infections by lowering viral replication rates, through the induction of antimicrobial peptides [^{[8], [9], [10]}] and by enhancing cellular immunity by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines and increasing concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines [^11,12].

Both epidemiological and clinical studies have shown that vitamin D, acting as an important immunomodulator, may reduce the incidence of respiratory tract infections in both adults and children [^{[13], [14], [15], [16], [17]}]. Randomized trials have also provided supportive evidence that vitamin D supplementation reduces risk of acute respiratory infections in these populations (22–24). A meta-analysis of 11,321 participants in 25 randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections (upper and lower respiratory tracts) demonstrated a protective effect of the intervention overall (12% reduction), but a particularly large magnitude of benefit (70% reduction) from supplementation in those with profound vitamin D deficiency at baseline [¹⁸]. However, results showed heterogeneity, with strong protective effects in some trials [^{[19], [20], [21]}] and others with null findings [^22,23]. This heterogeneity may reflect two factors: i) Variation in dose of vitamin D administered: some trials gave a low dose of ≤400 IU per day, and ii) Variation in participant characteristics: strongest protection effects against acute respiratory tract infection were seen among those with vitamin D deficiency at baseline. Given that SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus, the potential role of vitamin D in affording protection against this specific infection is promising but unknown.

COVID-19 patients with weakened innate immune systems may be susceptible to more severe symptoms and higher mortality [²⁴]. An impaired host immune system response may lead to higher SARS-COV-2 viral load and subsequent overactivation of the adaptive immune system that results in cytokine release syndrome [^25,26]. Vitamin D can modulate both the innate and adaptive immune responses [²⁷] and suppress the hyperinflammatory response during infection [³²].

Ecologic and demographic data also provide support for a protective role of vitamin D studies [^28,29]. Inverse correlations between mean levels of vitamin D in each of 20 European countries and the rates of COVID-19 diagnoses and mortality have been observed [³⁰]. Demographic groups known to be at elevated risk for vitamin D insufficiency— Black or Hispanic individuals, the elderly, nursing-home residents, and those with obesity, vascular comorbidities, or chronic kidney disease—are also those at higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and/or mortality. Finally, several observational studies have shown a significant association between a low serum 25(OH)D level status and worse clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients [^{[31], [32], [33]}]."

^{Live Expectancy calculations}

^{*1 The US data shows a 500 million life years lost. (1.5 years decline for the entire population of 330 million) But only 800 000 dead from Covid-19 at the end of 2021. So if we were to attribute all those deaths to Covid-19, it would mean that each of those 800 000 people had died 600 years too early. Which is impossible as no human lives even close to 600 years! Most people who die of Covid-19 have comorbidities and with proper treatment it would be reasonable to estimate a shortened lifespan of one year. Yet the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics gives out this life-expectancy figure and says it is mainly because of Covid-19 deaths. So either the data is showing a real reduction in life expectancy that can not be explained by the Covid-19 deaths so far and hence has to be attributed to the lockdowns or it somehow reflects a flawed statistical model .}

Please also take a look at our 2nd page - The good news